Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Johnson v. Wolfe
as 19-3891
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Colleen McMahon, Jane Doe, Case Manager for 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Robert Johnson v. Collins, Roche, Utley, et al
as 19-3865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID GERALD UTLEY, Attorney, COLLINS, ROCHE, UTLEY & GARNER, LLC, COLLEEN MCMAHON, Honorable and others
Johnson v. Wolf et al
as 1:2019cv07337
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Jane Doe, U.S. Postal Office Service, Second Circuit Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. McMahon
as 19-2174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Progressive Insurance Company, Judge Colleen McMahon and State of New York
Benoit v. Sioux County, Iowa et al
as 5:2019cv04026
Defendant:
Jason Bergsma, Judy Plendel, Sioux County, Iowa and others
Plaintiff:
Malinda Benoit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Collins, Roche, Utley & Garner LLC et al
as 5:2019cv01349
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
State of New York, Collins, Roche, Utley & Garner LLC, Attorney David G. Utley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. NADLER et al
as 1:2019cv01639
Defendant:
JOHN A. HOUSTON, EMMET SULLIVAN, COLLEEN MCMAHON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMANE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. McMahon et al
as 1:2019cv05090
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
The State of New York, Progressive Corporation and Judge Colleen McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Onatolu v. McMahon
as 19-1088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adekunle A. Onatolu
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Colleen McMahon
Onatolu v. McMahon
as 1:2019cv03173
Plaintiff:
Adekunle A. Onatolu
Defendant:
Judge Colleen McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
