Cases 21 - 30 of 309
Stone et al v. Internal Revenue Service Commissioner
as 9:2022cv80154
Plaintiff:
David E Stone, Kari S Carroll and David C Depadro
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner and Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Warrenton London, Sr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 22-1077
Petitioner / Appellant:
WARRENTON S. LONDON, SR. and CARLENE C. LONDON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Donnie Scott v. Janet Yellen, et al
as 21-15750
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET YELLEN, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and CHARLES P. RETTIG, U.S. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNIE SCOTT
Segal v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2020cv08681
Defendant:
US Attorney's Office, Commissioner Of Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner of Internal Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Segal
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Louis Shuman v. IRS
as 21-1070
Petitioner / Appellant:
SANDRA SHUMAN and LOUIS S. SHUMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Mattox v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2020cv02801
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Michael Mattox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfred Nicholson v. Commissioner of IRS
as 20-2002
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Petitioner / Appellant:
WINFRED F. NICHOLSON
Panic v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 6:2020cv01147
Plaintiff:
Gregory Panic
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Pengcheng Si v. IRS
as 20-1516
Petitioner / Appellant:
PENGCHENG SI
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Bi Zhang v. IRS
as 20-1453
Petitioner / Appellant:
BI JIAN ZHANG
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
