Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rubino v. Lackawann County et al
as 3:2018cv01211
Plaintiff:
Autumn Rubino
Defendant:
Lackawann County , Lackawanna County Prison Board , Tim Betti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clubb v. Ernest et al
as 3:2018cv50197
Plaintiff:
Gayla Clubb
Defendant:
Dave Ernest , Boone County , Guardian Correctional Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hazlerigg v. Correctional Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02157
Plaintiff:
John Hazlerigg
Defendant:
Correctional Care, Inc., Zaloga, Tim Betti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2017cv01191
Plaintiff:
Sparkes Wilson
Defendant:
Lackawanna County , Lackawanna County Prison Board , Tim Betti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehurst v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Amir Whitehurst
Defendant:
Lackawanna County , Patrick O'Malley , James Wansacz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. McMillan et al
as 1:2017cv00641
Plaintiff:
Lee E. Crawford
Defendant:
Robert McMillan, Edward J. Zaloga, Anthony Iannuzzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeanne Zaloga, et al v. Joseph Mercatili, et al
as 16-4449
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEANNE ZALOGA
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD ZALOGA, D.O., C.P.A. and CORRECTIONAL CARE INC
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF MOOSIC
Reed v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2016cv02143
Plaintiff:
James Reed
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Patrick O'Malley, Jim Wansacz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv01457
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
