Cases 21 - 30 of 235
Jogaak v. Hanson
as 4:2022cv04102
Plaintiff:
Jogaak D. Jogaak and Jogaak Jogaak
Defendant:
Sandra Hoglund Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Hendrickson v. Rapid City, Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc.
as 5:2022cv05063
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Hendrickson
Defendant:
Rapid City, Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jogaak v. Duffy
as 4:2022cv04091
Plaintiff:
Jogaak D. Jogaak
Defendant:
Veronica Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jogaak v. Grasz et al
as 4:2022cv04090
Plaintiff:
Jogaak D. Jogaak
Defendant:
Steven Grasz, Steven Colloton and Ralph Erickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jogaak v. Schreier
as 4:2022cv04092
Plaintiff:
Jogaak D. Jogaak
Defendant:
Karen Schreier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Bird v. Western Transport, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv05060
Plaintiff:
Megan Bird
Defendant:
Western Transport, LLC and Joshua D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rindahl v. Malsam-Rysdon et al
as 4:2022cv04073
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Kim Malsam-Rysdon, Joan Adam, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Boyer et al
as 5:2022cv05037
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Stephen A. Boyer, Pete Flores, Josh Haeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Spotted Elk v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv04031
Defendant:
Jessica Cook, Jeannie Bertch, Darrin Young and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gregory Spotted Elk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barse v. Menard, Inc.
as 5:2021cv05091
Plaintiff:
Darin D. Barse
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
