Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Kim v. Kimm
as 16-2944
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Daniel Kim
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael-Hyun W. Lee
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Michael S. Kimm, doing business as Kimm Law Firm, DBA Kimm Law Firm, Chul Ho Park, AKA Charlie Park, Jin Young Chung, AKA Jamie Chung and others
Defendant:
Hyung Suk Choi, AKA Stephen Choi
McLeod et al v. Valve Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv01227
Defendant:
Valve Corporation, Thomas Cassell, James Varga and others
Plaintiff:
McLeod, Samuel Joines, Sam Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Nicholas Patrick v. West Justice Center et al
as 8:2016cv00827
Defendant:
John Adams, John Adams, Madeline Berkley and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Patrick
Ribeiro v. Roden et al
as 1:2016cv01415
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Ribeiro
Defendant:
John Roden and Daniel Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kim v. GS Sports Inc.
as 1:2015cv09819
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kim
Defendant:
GS Sports Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Avery Craftsman, Inc. v. Flores et al
as 5:2015cv00959
Defendant:
Jin Choi, Steve Cobb, Dong Cui and others
Plaintiff:
James Avery Craftsman, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Marine Sarian v. Marju Cruz et al
as 2:2015cv08516
Defendant:
Marju Cruz, Daniel Kim, Han Ko and others
Plaintiff:
Marine Sarian
Kim v. Kimm et al
as 1:2015cv04784
Defendant:
Charlie and You, Inc., Hyung Suk Choi, Jin Young Chung and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kim
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sik Gaek, Inc. v. Yogi's II, Inc.
as 14-3134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sik Gaek, Inc., AKA Silk Gaek, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Yogi's II, Inc. and Daniel Kim
Sivetts, et al v. Board of County Commissioners, et al
as 14-1050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW SIVETTS, JOEL MAYNS, ROSEMARIE WATSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO and TED MINK, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Jefferson County, Colorado
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
