Cases 21 - 30 of 165
Penna v. North Clackamas School District et al
as 3:2022cv01417
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Penna and Daniel Penna
Defendant:
North Clackamas School District #12, Oregon Department of Education and North Clackamas School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15140
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PAUL ROBERTSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Malcolm Johnson, et al v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALCOLM JOHNSON, STEPHANIE KAISER, JESSIE CLARK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BROWN, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Oregon and PATRICK ALLEN, in his official capacity as Director of the Oregon Health Authority
ZEIGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06443
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PAUL ZEIGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Flynn v. Hannaford, et al
as 22-1184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL PAUL FLYNN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLENE HANNAFORD, Deputy Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Revenue, HARRY KYMISSIS, Collections, Supervisor: Massachusetts Department of Revenue and HARRY KYMISSIS, Collections Supervisor of the Massachusetts Department of Revenue
Shajuanda Martin v. Kilolo Kijakazi, et al
as 22-15249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAJUANDA MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL and DANIEL PAUL TALBERT
Daniel Stoddard v. Steven Harker, et al
as 22-35043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL PAUL STODDARD
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN HARKER and STATE OF IDAHO
Stoddard v. State of Idaho
as 1:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Lt. Daniel Paul Stoddard
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
