Cases 21 - 30 of 112
Antwon French v. David Hester, et al
as 22-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWON FRENCH, aka Markell Moore
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BRYAN HESTER, LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION OF POLICE, Fayette Commonwealth's Attorney's Office, LOU ANNA RED CORN and others
Winters v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
David Bryan Winters
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRYAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv48707
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIELDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41687
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYAN FIELDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAROUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20726
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYAN MAROUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Carlos Garcia v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Scott Phillips, Ed Berakovich, Otis Sterling, III and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carlos Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballard v. Anderson, et al
as 21-4017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRYAN BALLARD
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL HINES, KEN ANDERSON and JOHN BRADLEY
Van Dyke et al v. Bryan's Engine & Heads LLC et al
as 1:2020cv04207
Defendant:
Bryan's Engine & Heads LLC and David Bryan
Plaintiff:
Lance Van Dyke and By the Book Auto Brokers, Inc.
BRYAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45469
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVID BRYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. Gore et al
as 3:2020cv00961
Respondent:
William D. Gore and State of California
Petitioner:
David Bryan Turner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
