Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 40
In re: Perry Dean Mason
as 16-14303
Petitioner: In re: PERRY DEAN MASON
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05129
Plaintiff: Keith Adair Davis
Defendant: Washington State Department of Corrections, G Hammond, ADA Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troupe v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv05671
Plaintiff: David Troupe
Defendant: Donna Smith, Scott Russell, Eric Wirt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troupe v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv05439
Plaintiff: David Troupe
Defendant: Donna Smith, Scott Russell, Eric Wiet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thrasher v. Mason We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01632
Petitioner: Michael Thomas Thrasher
Respondent: Dean Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Perry Mason
as 14-14153
Petitioner: In re: PERRY DEAN MASON
Mandamus Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mason v. Anderson et al
as 4:2012cv01355
Plaintiff: Randall Dean Mason
Defendant: Chad Anderson, Eugene Barry, Bruce Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls-Stewart v. Warner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv05381
Plaintiff: Hillary Walls-Stewart
Defendant: Bernard Warner, Steve Hammond, Scott Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry Mason v. USA
as 12-11969
Petitioner - Appellant: PERRY DEAN MASON
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cardenas v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2011cv05117
Plaintiff: Leopold Cardenas
Defendant: Maggie Miller-Stout, Harold Clarke, Duenich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?