Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Varenhorst et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05289
Plaintiff:
Gail Marie Varenhorst and Donald Henry Varenhorst
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Price v. Henry et al
as 5:2012cv02733
Plaintiff:
Justin Price
Defendant:
Donald Henry , City of Shreveport and Police Dept of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lucky v. Haynes et al
as 3:2012cv02609
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dwayne Lucky
Defendant:
Sandra Haynes, NFN Nafrauri, K Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Williams v. Henry et al
as 1:2009cv22438
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Williams
Defendant:
Donald Henry, Fredrick Domphy, Tina Pate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
AL-BAIDANY et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2005cv02380
Petitioner:
ZAKARIA AL-BAIDANY, ABDEL AZIZ AL-SWIDI, AHMED MOHAMMED HASSIN AL RAMMAH and others
Respondent:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD HENRY RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PARACHA v. BUSH et al
as 1:2004cv02022
Petitioner:
SAIFULLAH PARACHA, FARHAT PARACHA, ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Interested Party:
PRIVILEGE TEAM
Respondent:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD HENRY RUMSFELD and JAY HOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCSALLY v. RUMSFELD
as 1:2001cv02481
Plaintiff:
MARTHA MCSALLY
Defendant:
DONALD HENRY RUMSFELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
