Cases 21 - 30 of 213
HAMLIN v. USA et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2012cv00082
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R HAMLIN
Defendant:
USA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, NOEL C MARCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Jackson v. Terrell
as 9:2012cv00365
Petitioner:
Scott Jackson
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Berkun v. Terrell
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2012cv00706
Petitioner:
Alan M. Berkun
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DiPierro v. Terrell
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2012cv00208
Petitioner:
Oren Dean Dipierro
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Opoku-Agyemang v. Terrell
as 9:2012cv00213
Petitioner:
Kofi Opoku-Agyemang
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Estrella v. Terrell
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2012cv00543
Petitioner:
Franlyn Angel Estrella
Respondent:
Warden Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DiPierro v. Terrell
as 1:2012cv00311
Petitioner:
Oren Dean DiPierro
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stevenson v. Holder
as 12-73
Petitioner - Appellant:
Gordon D. Stevenson
Respondent - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General and Duke Terrell, Warden
Opoku-Agyemang v. Terrell
as 1:2011cv09621
Petitioner:
Kofi Opoku-Agyemang
Respondent:
Duke Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.