Cases 21 - 30 of 64
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv53286
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. City of Winder et al
as 2:2020cv00052
Plaintiff:
Steven S. Martin
Defendant:
Maddison Dean, Chris Cooper, Rikki Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19393
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv00859
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Daniel Evans
as 19-3780
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Evans
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
McGhee et al v. Light et al
as 3:2019cv00143
Defendant:
Daniel Evans, Sarah Ferencz, Elizabeth Ey and others
Plaintiff:
Nakela McGhee and Patrick Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EVANS v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv10178
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION,, ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH DANIEL EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Brinderson Constructors Inc.
as 4:2018cv07361
Defendant:
Brinderson Constructors Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Evans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
D'Amato v. Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2018cv04397
Plaintiff:
Irina Ioana D'Amato
Defendant:
Health and Human Services, Children Protective Services, Tracy Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Amato v. Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2018cv04397
Defendant:
City & County of San Francisco, Health and Human Services, San Francisco Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Irina Ioana D'Amato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
