Cases 21 - 30 of 94
Ortiz-Medina v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv01455
Petitioner:
Daniel Ortiz-Medina
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv47145
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91884
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58964
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. VOORHEES TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv03637
Defendant:
VOORHEES TOWNSHIP, JOHN DOES 1-5, DANIEL ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04797
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORTIZ-TAVAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24007
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC DANIEL ORTIZ-TAVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz-Medina v. Kizziah et al
as 6:2020cv00021
Defendant:
FNU Philip, Gregory Kizziah and USA
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz-Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Ortiz v. Torgenson, et al
as 19-4163
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENN PICKETT, Sgt., RUSTY BRAITHWAIT, Officer, ROGER PETERSON, Lt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL ORTIZ
Torres et al v. 894 Deklab Pizza Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv05750
Plaintiff:
Miguel Herreros Torres and Juan Daniel Ortiz Reyes
Defendant:
894 Deklab Pizza Corp. and Roberto "Doe"
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
