Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Gene Favors v. Jeff Woods, et al
as 17-1356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE T. FAVORS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF WOODS, Warden, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager, Grievance Section, DAVID M. LEACH, Special Activities Coordinator and others
Ronald Davis v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, THOMAS G. FINCO, DAVID M. LEACH and others
Young #753683 v. McKee et al
as 2:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
DeMarcus T. Young #753683
Defendant:
Kenneth T. McKee and David M. Leach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gene Favors v. Jeff Woods, et al
as 16-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE T. FAVORS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF WOODS, Warden, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager, Grievance Section, DAVID M. LEACH, Special Activities Coordinator and others
Ronquest v. Newton et al
as 5:2016ct03179
Plaintiff:
James Roger Ronquest
Defendant:
S. Newton, S. Moss, David C. Leach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leach v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04827
Plaintiff:
David R. Leach
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Favors #159735 v. Woods et al
as 2:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
Gene T. Favors #159735
Defendant:
Jeff Woods, Richard D. Russell, Unknown Rink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEACH v. ACTION CARS ON 9, LLC
as 3:2015cv05447
Petitioner:
DAVID E LEACH , III
Respondent:
ACTION CARS ON 9, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
LEACH v. OLIVA SUPERMARKETS LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03174
Petitioner:
DAVID E LEACH , III
Respondent:
OLIVA SUPERMARKETS LLC , RL MARKETS I LLC and ALTER EGOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Davis #223815 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamont Davis #223815
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Thomas Finco, David M. Leach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
