Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Allen v. Moyster et al
as 4:2020cv00097
Defendant:
Michael Nelson, Dukes, Mark Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allen and Derrick Lamont Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Smith et al
as 4:2020cv04012
Defendant:
Officer Ellis, Corporal Smith, Sergeant Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Caelin Duke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lydon v. McCormick et al
as 6:2018cv06078
Defendant:
Mark Chamberlain, Deputy Jarrethm, John Doe VI and others
Plaintiff:
Candace Paige Lydon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Travis E Duke
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Novero v. Duke Energy Florida LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00649
Plaintiff:
Primo C Novero
Defendant:
Duke Energy Florida LLC, URS Energy and Construction Inc and CDI Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxwell/G-Doffee v. Jackson et al
as 5:2017cv00248
Plaintiff:
Don Merceleany R Maxwell/G-Doffee
Defendant:
Deanne Jackson, Walker, Cherylynn D Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. McCormick et al
as 6:2017cv06059
Defendant:
Mike McCormick , Southwest Correctional Medical Group, Ronnie Branstetter and others
Plaintiff:
Toby E. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laquerre v. McCormick et al
as 6:2017cv06039
Plaintiff:
Richard James Laquerre
Defendant:
Mike McCormick, Waggenhauser, Dukes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Springfellow
as 5:2017cv00106
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dewayne Duke
Defendant:
Steven Springfellow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System v. Charles Murphy Holley, Jr. et al
as 5:2017cv05053
Plaintiff:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Movant:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Respondent:
Charles Murphy Holley, Jr.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Michael T Duke
Intervenor:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
