Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Laccinole v. Rausch,Sturm,Israel,Enerson & Hornik LLP et al
as 1:2020cv00312
Defendant:
Gregory Enerson, Kenneth Wake, Rausch,Sturm,Israel,Enerson & Hornik LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cornell v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2020cv00255
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Cornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Sankey v. UTGR, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
Twin River Management Group, Inc. and UTGR, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sankey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anvar et al v. Tanner et al
as 1:2019cv00523
Plaintiff:
Kambis Anvar, Vincent Colapietro, Michelle Drum and others
Defendant:
Peter Neronha and Elizabeth Tanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elizabeth D. v. Saul
as 1:2019cv00480
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dailey
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00451
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ricketts et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00229
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ricketts and William Ricketts, Jr.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Baby Products, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elizabeth L. v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00072
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Landon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DeCotis-Thomas v. Town of North Kingstown et al
as 1:2018cv00602
Plaintiff:
Cheryl DeCotis-Thomas
Defendant:
Phillip Auger, Mary King, Donna Sweet and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
DeCotis-Thomas v. Town of North Smithfield et al
as 1:2018cv00601
Defendant:
Town of North Smithfield, Phillip Auger, Mary King and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl DeCotis-Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
