Cases
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Stone v. New AR Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00105
Plaintiff: Edward Stone
Defendant: New AR Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Durden, Jr. v. Strain et al
as 2:2014cv01445
Plaintiff: Donald J. Durden, Jr.
Defendant: Rodney Jack Strain, Bryant Estes and Edward Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc., et al v. State of Georgia, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-10387
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC., BAPTIST TABERNACLE OF THOMASTON GEORGIA INC., EDWARD STONE and others
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF GEORGIA, UPSON COUNTY GEORGIA, GOVERNOR OF GEORGIA and others
GeorgiaCarry Org Inc et al v. The State of Georgia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00302
Plaintiff: GeorgiaCarry Org Inc , The Baptist Tabernacle of Thomaston Georgia Inc , Edward Stone and others
Defendant: The State of Georgia and Upson County Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv02765
Plaintiff: Edward Stone
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b) Inj or loss property, personal inj, death; US DFT
Neil Stone v. CDC
as 09-16760
Petitioner - Appellant: NEIL EDWARD STONE
Respondent - Appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Stone v. California Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00141
Petitioner: Neil Edward Stone
Respondent: California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. California Department of Corrections
as 1:2007cv01550
Petitioner: Neil Edward Stone
Respondent: California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?