Cases 21 - 30 of 852
Cox v. Drumwright et al
as 5:2023cv05217
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Corporal Drumwright, Lieutenant Atchley, John Doe Mail Log Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Allen v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections and Well Path
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattingly v. McCune et al
as 2:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Michael Mattingly
Defendant:
Judge Marc McCune, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and Public Defender Arron Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Carthers
as 4:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Roy Edward Hall
Defendant:
Kelly Carthers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Nacho Daddy LLC v. Edwards
as 4:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Nacho Daddy LLC
Defendant:
Chris Edwards doing business as Nacho Daddy's BBQ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Edwards v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01099
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Plaintiff:
Sheila Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Budnik et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, William Freeman, Thomas Rolland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friend v. Duncan et al
as 4:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Earnest Edward Friend
Defendant:
Gina Duncan, Sheila Robertson, Brianna Thomson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Edward White
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Randy Morgan, Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
