Cases 21 - 30 of 1,056
Jackson, III v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
David Edward Jackson, III
Defendant:
Warden
Respondent:
Indiana Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TYREE v. EASTWOOD et al
as 1:2023cv02303
Plaintiff:
SHANE TYREE
Defendant:
KENT EASTWOOD, CHRISTINA PACE, FRANK WOLFE, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez et al v. Landmark Sign Partners, LLC
as 2:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Felipe H. Hernandez, Alec Davis, Frank Mikolajczyk and others
Defendant:
Landmark Sign Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
PARTLOW v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv02208
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
BROWN, EARNEST, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT, A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEATLEY v. BRYD et al
as 1:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
RAY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. and ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR.
Defendant:
SAMUEL BRYD, CENTURION, BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONCUR v. GARLAND TRUCKING, INC et al
as 1:2023cv02053
Plaintiff:
JARON C. MONCUR
Defendant:
GARLAND TRUCKING, INC and EDWARD H. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SISK v. IMPD et al
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EDWARD SISK
Defendant:
IMPD, INDIANAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL AUTHORITIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COTTRELL et al v. SPEEDWAY, INC.
as 1:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
LYLA COTTRELL and EDWARD COTTRELL
Defendant:
SPEEDWAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
