Cases 21 - 30 of 100
(HC) Lopez v. Gamboa
as 1:2021cv01761
Petitioner:
Enrique Lopez
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Victor Garcia
as 21-10336
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
VICTOR GARCIA, AKA Jimmy, AKA Enrique Lopez
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45466
Plaintiff:
JAVIER ENRIQUE LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quesada v. Martinez et al
as 3:2021cv00087
Defendant:
Robert Erbe, J.D. Whitaker, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and others
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Quesada
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Juan Lopez-Acosta v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-70327
Petitioner:
JUAN ENRIQUE LOPEZ-ACOSTA
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General
Lopez-Soto v. USA
as 3:2021cv01071
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos Enrique Lopez-Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Enrique Lopez-Garcia v. William Barr
as 20-71938
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE LOPEZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Carlos Lopez-Flores v. William Barr
as 20-71620
Petitioner:
CARLOS ENRIQUE LOPEZ-FLORES
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Gayle et al v. Field Office Director Miami Field Office et al
as 1:2020cv21553
Petitioner:
Rene Jonathan Rosas Cardenas, Roseline Ostine, Mohamed Hasan and others
Respondent:
Field Office Director, Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Attorney General
Special Master:
Matthew C Dates
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Rodney Martin, Hatem Chourabi, Esq. Sharon Kegerreis and others
Intervenor:
Reinier Guiba Avila, Luis Enrique Lopez-Pena, Lazaro Jose Gutierrez Suarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
