Cases 21 - 30 of 328
MILLS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00717
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN ALEXANDER MILLS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RAGGIO v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
MOSLEY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00443
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN JAMES MOSLEY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. Franklin et al
as 5:2023ct03194
Plaintiff:
Sherman Green
Defendant:
Sergeant Franklin and Correctional Officer Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson et al v. Franklin County Board of Education
as 5:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Watson and lee ossino
Defendant:
Franklin County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Bullard
as 5:2023ct03104
Plaintiff:
Allen Littlejohn
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oshea, et al v. Freightworks, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Martin Oshea, Misty Chapman, Bryan Allen and others
Defendant:
Freightworks, LLC, Freightworks Admin, LLC, Freightworks Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Edwards v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03119
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Edwards
Defendant:
J. Bullard, Mr. Jacobs, Franklin Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. PERT Team
as 5:2023ct03057
Plaintiff:
William Franklin McBride
Defendant:
PERT Team
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
