Cases 21 - 30 of 57
McCabe v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv01775
Defendant:
C. Casper, J. Cook, S. Cost-Streety and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirsio Cruz et al v. Ricardo Oliva et al
as 5:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Kirsio Cruz, H G Long Associates and H G Long
Defendant:
Does, Ricardo Oliva and Sofia Stubblefield
Hanson v. Martin et al
as 2:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
Dale Ray Hanson
Defendant:
Barry L Martin, James R Beach, Gregory S David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMISSIONING AGENTS, INC. v. LONG et al
as 1:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
COMMISSIONING AGENTS, INC
Defendant:
HUGH GENERAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, HUGHCX, LLC, ROBERT G LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jorge Montenegro v. Quinten Evans, et al
as 14-10647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE MONTENEGRO
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT QUINTEN E. EVANS, SERGEANT RAMON G. LONG and SERGEANT CANDANCE J. MARTINEZ
Long v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01866
Plaintiff:
Sybil G Long
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Long v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:14-cv-02670
Plaintiff:
James G. Long
Defendant:
Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. , Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and Keurig, Incorporated
Montenegro v. Evans et al
as 2:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jorge Montenegro
Defendant:
Quinten E. Evans, Ramon G. Long and Candance J. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02670
Plaintiff:
James G. Long
Defendant:
Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and Keurig, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00565
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
