Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Willie Simpson v. Dane Esser, et al
as 16-3666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE C. SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DANE ESSER, SHAWN GALLINGER, CHRISTOPHER FOLEY and others
Ulises Garcia, et al v. Kamala Harris
as 16-56125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ULISES GARCIA, JORDAN GALLINGER, BRIAN HILL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California
Jordan Gallinger, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 16-56125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA JANG, FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, TRACEY GRAHAM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California
Amicus Curiae:
CATO INSTITUTE
Ulises Garcia et al v. Kamala Harris
as 2:2016cv02572
Plaintiff:
Scott Dipman, Lisa Jang, Ulises Garcia and others
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gallinger v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02062
Plaintiff:
Laura Gallinger
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. Leffeler et al
as 2:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M Boyd
Defendant:
Lt Leffeler , CO Gallinger, CO Wigel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Leffler et al
as 1:2015cv01550
Plaintiff:
Demetrius M Boyd
Defendant:
Leffler, Brown, Gallinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08713
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
London v. Walls et al
as 2:2015cv00430
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Defendant:
Edward Walls , Cathy A Jess, Marc W Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. DiMotto et al
as 2:2015cv00429
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Defendant:
Jean DiMotto, David A Clarke , Edward Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
