Cases 21 - 30 of 172
GAROFALO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05763
Plaintiff:
DOMENICO GAROFALO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GURVEY et al v. M&T BANK, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
H. SCOTT GURVEY and AMY R. WEISSBROD GURVEY
Defendant:
M&T BANK, INC., ESSEX COUNTY OF NEW JERSEY, SCHILLER, KNAPP, LEFKOWITZ & HERTZEL, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sowa et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Alexander Sowa, Stephen V. Caggiano, Edward Michael Jacobs and others
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Mercedes-Benz Group AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Garofalo v. H.H. Barnum Co.
as 2:2023cv10277
Plaintiff:
Joseph Garofalo
Defendant:
H.H. Barnum Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Bruno v. Iuliano et al
as 1:2022cv07908
Defendant:
Michele Iuliano, Anisa Moloney, Michele Luliano and others
Plaintiff:
Alessandro Bruno
Garofalo v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv07620
Plaintiff:
Joseph Garofalo
Defendant:
City of New York and Police Commissioner Keechant L. Sewell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act
(PS) Dearman v. Olivera et al
as 2:2022cv02158
Plaintiff:
Ryan Alan Dearman
Defendant:
Elizabeth Ufkes Olivera, Bradley Morrow, Joe Garofalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
