Cases 21 - 30 of 2,593
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Newsom et al
as 5:2024cv02478
Plaintiff:
Juan T. Tyler
Defendant:
Governor of CA Gavin Newsom, Warden Jeffrey Macomber, Warden Edward Borla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kramer v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2024cv02417
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Kramer
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, J. Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Powell
as 7:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. PNC Bank
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 24-2263
Plaintiff:
RALPH COLEMAN, JORGE ANDRADE RICO, PETER COCKCROFT and others
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, JEFF MACOMBER, JOE STEPHENSHAW and others
Bruce Koklich et al v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 5:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich and Lawrence Remsen
Defendant:
Gavin C. Newsom, Patricia Guerrero, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTLEDGE v. DEVORE-GUIFARRO et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Defendant:
BRACHER, E DEVORE-GUIFARRO, BODIFORD and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE VINCENT RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Dallam et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
Ramsey Dallam, Steve Conrad, Detective Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
