Cases 1 - 10 of 100
(PS) Garcia v. Newsom
as 2:2026cv02556
Plaintiff:
Michael Garcia
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prete v. Benjamin et al
as 1:2026cv00474
Plaintiff:
Michael Prete
Defendant:
Mark Benjamin, Peter Neronha, Stephen Dambruch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Cannavan v. Newsom et al
as 1:2026cv05670
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Cannavan
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, CDCR, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Prasad v. State of California et al
as 2:2026cv02488
Plaintiff:
Kevin B. Prasad
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (CDCR), California Health Care Facility Stockton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. French, et al.
as 26-4536
Plaintiff:
DARONTA T. LEWIS
Defendant:
A. FRENCH, TRENT ALLEN, GAVIN NEWSOM and others
Gavin v. Caren, et al.
as 26-4509
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GAVIN
Defendant:
BARRY CAREN, MICHELLE GAVIN, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP and others
Abraham Pinzon v. DOJ, et al
as 26-5265
Plaintiff:
Abraham G. Pinzon
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Christopher A. Wray and Gavin Newsom, California Governor
ABC IP, LLC, et al., v. East Coast Cerakote LLC, et al.
as 4:2026cv00831
Plaintiff:
ABC IP, LLC, Rare Breed Triggers, Inc. and RBTM LLC
Defendant:
East Coast Cerakote LLC and Gavin Luzier
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
(HC) Kelly v. Horn et al
as 1:2026cv05302
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
Pat Horn, Shubhangini Devine and Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Carroll v. Newsom et al
as 1:2026cv05237
Plaintiff:
Harry Carroll
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Deputy Director California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
