Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Chen v. Holder
as 13-2214
Petitioner:
Hao Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00189
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guo et al v. Hotel 91 Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07842
Plaintiff:
Yan Juan Guo , Chang Hao Chen and Cui Fang Mei
Defendant:
Hotel 91 Inc., Regal Property Management Inc. and Mailan Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chen v. WAI ? Cafe Inc.
as 12-1845
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Yong Kui Chen, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and Guo Ren Huang
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Hao Chen, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, You Huang Zhu, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Zu Guang Zhu, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Wai Yin Chan
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
WAI ? Cafe Inc.
Ou v. Holder
as 12-1029
Petitioner:
Yun Yan Ou and Hao Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Chen v. Holder
as 12-564
Petitioner:
Shi Hao Chen, AKA Ci Hao Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Chen v. Jagex Limited
as 2:2011cv01802
Plaintiff:
Hao Chen
Defendant:
Jagex Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Tang v. Holder
as 11-3143
Petitioner:
Li Xiang Tang and Hao Chen
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Hao Chen v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-1661
Petitioner:
HAO CHEN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Tiffany (NJ), LLC v. Chen et al
as 2:2011cv00202
Plaintiff:
Tiffany (NJ), LLC
Defendant:
Hao Chen, Zheng Yanfei, Elanadbin Zhongliang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
