Cases 21 - 30 of 2,251
Graves v. Chadwick Dotson
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Graves
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Charles Massey v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6006
Petitioner:
CHARLES ALBERT MASSEY
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Mr. Dillon, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipford v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
Keon Deshea Lipford
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00606
Petitioner:
Richard A. Patterson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bartee v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Steven Bartee
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke and Gloria F. Sivels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Hammer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-7168
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY LEON HAMMER
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
Eason v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv01565
Petitioner:
Anthony James Eason
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swart v. Miyares, et al.
as 3:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Hall Swart, III
Defendant:
Jason S. Miyares and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
David Meyers v. Warden
as 23-7121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, of Red Onion State Prison, HAROLD W. CLARKE, VA DOC Director and KYLE ROSCH, VADOC Interstate Compact Administrator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
