Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Hatcher v. Gary Community School Corporation
as 2:2013cv00353
Plaintiff:
Ragen H Hatcher
Defendant:
Gary Community School Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HATCHER v. ROHANA et al
as 1:2012cv01486
Defendant:
JENNIFER A. BARNER, KATHY S. EDRINGTON, Dr. NAVEEN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HATCHER v. WYNN et al
as 2:2012cv00197
Defendant:
MRS. BYRER, MR. HARTSOCK, MICHAEL RAINS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HATCHER v. ROHANA et al
as 2:2012cv00184
Defendant:
JENNIFER BURNS, KATHY S. EDRINGTON, MICHAEL A. MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HATCHER v. BYRERS et al
as 2:2012cv00183
Defendant:
Mrs. BYRERS, MICHAEL RAINS, RECORDS OFFICE SUPERVISOR and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HATCHER v. MCMATH et al
as 2:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Defendant:
RUTH JOHNSON, PATRICIA MCMATH and MARGRET G. ROBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HATCHER v. MCMATH et al
as 2:2012cv00163
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Defendant:
RUTH JOHNSON, PATRICIA MCMATH and MARGRET G. ROBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HATCHER v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Defendant:
RUTH JOHNSON and PATRICIA MCMATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
HATCHER v. BURNS et al
as 2:2012cv00131
Defendant:
JENNIFER BURNS, NURSE CATHY, DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL OF THE INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
