Cases 21 - 30 of 182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anwari v. Momand
as 3:2022cv04357
Petitioner:
Sharifa Anwari
Respondent:
Ahmad Momand
Interested Party:
U.S. Central Authority for the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and Santa Clara County Office of the District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Drummer v. Maynard
as 22-40449
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cornel Jackie Drummer
Defendant / Appellee:
Ken Maynard, III, Aaron Mohantly, Dr. Hague, Medical Doctor and others
Hague v. Commissioner for Social Security
as 2:2022cv02493
Plaintiff:
Terry Q. Hague
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00374
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HAGUE-RENWICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05467
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE HAGUE-RENWICK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniel Pristavec, et al v. Meno Holdings SPV, LP, et al
as 22-15479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL PRISTAVEC and JUSTIN HAGUE
Defendant / Appellee:
MENO HOLDINGS SPV, LP and ADIT VENTURES, LLC
Letters Rogatory from the Local Court of Konstanz, Germany
as 2:2021mc01093
In Re:
Letters Rogatory from the Local Court of Konstanz, Germany
Petitioner:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hague Convention
Battams v. Cohen et al
as 2:2021cv00632
Plaintiff:
Steven Battams
Defendant:
Peter A. Cohen, Willie C. Bogan, Chris Nolet and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
