Cases 21 - 30 of 163
Hammonds v. Carolina Covertech, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Makayla Hammonds
Defendant:
Carolina Covertech, Inc. and Frankcrum 11, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hammond v. Chaney et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Cheiron Nathaniel Hammond
Defendant:
Investigator Chaney, Coffee Correctional/Core Civic and Officer Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jack v. Union County et al
as 2:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
Jaiyeola Jack
Defendant:
Union County, Union Sheriff Office and Det. Andrew Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Craig et al
as 1:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Glenn S. Rhodes
Defendant:
Superior Judge Daniel Craig, Adam Land, Barbara Claridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
as 1:2021cv00210
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice
Plaintiff:
Crystal Hammond
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Leslie v. 1125 Hammond LP et al
as 1:2020cv04925
Plaintiff:
Ron Leslie
Defendant:
Chad Heard, Sun Holdings Group doing business as Sync Residential and 1125 Hammond LP doing business as Sync Residential
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2020cv00088
Defendant:
J RICKS, JOE CHAPMAN, COREY WARD and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ESTEN WILLIAMS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMOND v. BIBB COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 5:2020cv00276
Defendant:
MACON HOSPITAL, BIBB COUNTY COURTHOUSE, MEDICAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA-LEE HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roswell Hammond Acquisition LLC v. Stephens
as 1:2019cv05674
Plaintiff:
Roswell Hammond Acquisition LLC
Defendant:
Quinice Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
