Cases 21 - 30 of 142
Mountain Projects Inc. v. Boyd
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Mountain Projects Inc.
Defendant:
Heather Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Belton v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Clarence Delano Belton, Jr
Defendant:
Heather Loveridge and City of Charlotte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Heather Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lohrenz et al v. Bragg Communities, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Amy Lohrenz, Major Michael Lohrenz, MGL and others
Defendant:
Bragg Communities, LLC, Corvias Management-Army, LLC, Corvias Military Living, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Durham v. City of Charlotte
as 3:2021cv00638
Plaintiff:
Heather Nicole Durham
Defendant:
Charlotte, City of and City of Charlotte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Farrior et al v. Ballard et al
as 7:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
Wendy Farrior, Madison Bowen, Murguia Arya and others
Defendant:
Dali Ballard, Tony Stroud, Children's Learning Center II of Wilmington, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gunn v. Padgett
as 1:2021cv00166
Defendant:
Brandon R. Padgett
Plaintiff:
Heather Kathleen Gunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan
as 1:2021cv00138
Defendant:
Ingles Markets, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan
Plaintiff:
Heather Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
CARRINGTON v. ROSS et al
as 1:2021cv00350
Defendant:
BUTNER FCI FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DR. HEATHER ROSS
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
