Cases
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Kirwin et al v. Teamsters Local Union No. 690 et al
as 2:2010cv00365
Plaintiff: Holly Kirwin and Gail Anderson
Defendant: Teamsters Local Union No. 690, Justin Holliday and Val Holstrom
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Burton v. Litwiller, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:1999cv20827
Plaintiff: Larry Allen Burton
Defendant: M. Litwiller, D. San Giovanni , D. Archambault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Holstrom
as 2:2008cv00245
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Tina M Holstrom
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Melissa Murphy v. Riverside County Superior Court et al
as 5:2008cv00867
Plaintiff: Melissa Murphy
Defendant: Riverside County Superior Court, Matthew Perantoni, Vivian - and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Holstrom v. National Standard Company
as 5:2007cv01337
Plaintiff: Chad Holstrom
Defendant: National Standard Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Becker v. Hudson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01418
Petitioner: Jan F Becker
Respondent: Hudson, G W Bush, A Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOLSTROM et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68020
Plaintiff: CHARLES HOLSTROM and THERESA HOLSTROM
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., A.C. &S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dana N. Holstrom v. Burlington Northern & SantaFe Railway Co.
as MOW/4:00-CV-00419
Defendant: Burlington Northern & SantaFe Railway Co.
Plaintiff: Dana N. Holstrom
Holstrom v. Rapid American Corp.
as VAE/2:99-CV-01845
Plaintiff: Holstrom
Defendant: Rapid American Corp.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?