Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanders v. Correctional Care Solutions et al
as 1:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Melvin Sanders
Defendant:
Correctional Care Solutions, Reichards, Shock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barclay v. Horn et al
as 3:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Barclay
Defendant:
Fredrick Horn , SSS Trucking Inc and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The W.L. Harper Company v. Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport Authority et al
as 5:2014cv05390
Plaintiff:
The W.L. Harper Company
Defendant:
Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport Authority and Kimley-Horn and Associates Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Northwest Arkansas Regional Airport Authority
Counter_defendant:
The W.L. Harper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Obamas et al v. Nance et al
as 1:2014cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jack Freeman
Defendant:
Melvin Nance, Tiera Pickering, Jennifer Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Corizon Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
Byron L Conway
Defendant:
Corizon Inc, Betty Hutchinson, Melvin Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dancy v. Hobbs et al
as 1:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Michael Dancy
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, John Maples, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dancy v. Hobbs et al
as 1:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
Michael Dancy
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, John Maples, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McWhirter v. Ramsey et al
as 2:2012cv00199
Plaintiff:
Mickey McWhirter
Defendant:
Raylina Ramsey, Richard L Guy, Billy Cowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
