Cases 21 - 30 of 266
Michael L. Hust v. Crestbrook Insurance Company et al
as 8:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Hust
Defendant:
Crestbrook Insurance Company and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Oxley v. Contra Costa County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Samuel Russ Oxley
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriff Department, Samuel Jones, Daniel Husted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Husted v. Kizakazi
as 3:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Shane Lorenze Husted
Defendant:
Kilolo Kizakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Husted v. Shibley
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Husted
Defendant:
Lee Shibley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Ohio Ethics Commission et al.
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Michael W Bradley
Defendant:
Ohio Ethics Commission, Executive Director Paul M Nick, Chairman Merom Brachman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HUST v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23992
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY HUST
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phelps v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Don Davis, R. Covey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atencio et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Director Atencio, Director Tewalt, Deputy Director Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent Williams v. Leeflang, et al
as 22-35615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT GLEN WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
LEEFLANG, Paralegal, ROBBERT WHEILER, RICHARDSON, Warden and others
DeMoss et al v. City of Visalia
as 1:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
Zachary DeMoss, William Qualls, Will Binder and others
Defendant:
City of Visalia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
