Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Jaimes v. Barnes et al
as 1:2014cv00952
Plaintiff:
Juan Jaimes
Defendant:
Robert J. Barnes, J. Akanno, S. Schaefer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minaxi Patel v. John McHugh
as 14-11544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MINAXI I. PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army
Patel et al v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
Mira T. Madhav and Anant I. Patel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Patrick Kunkel v. Sherry Lopez, et al
as 14-15363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK KUNKEL
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERRY LOPEZ, CMO Kern Valley State Prison, I. PATEL, Dr. at Kern Valley State Prison, A. SHITTU, Dr. at Kern Valley State Prison and others
RSUI Indemnity Company v. Desai et al
as 8:2013cv02629
Plaintiff:
RSUI Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Akshay M. Desai, Sandip I. Patel, Seema Desai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Patel v. McHugh
as 4:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Minaxi I. Patel
Defendant:
John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gary Lacy v. H. Tyson, et al
as 12-17566
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY ANDRE LACY
Defendant - Appellee:
H. TYSON, Captain, J. PEACOCK, Sergeant, M. BROOK WALTER, Sergeant and others
Patel et al v. Aviva Life and Annuity Company
as 1:2012cv00724
Defendant:
Aviva Life and Annuity Company, Corporate Benefit Services, Inc., Ken A. Stover and others
Plaintiff:
Mira T. Madhav Patel and Anant I. Patel, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
