Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Ahn et al v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Chang Ahn, Aeja Kim, Mi Won Kim and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Kim et al v. Arias
as 1:2016cv05762
Defendant:
Jose Arias
Plaintiff:
Tan Kim and Jae Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Eugene Quishenberry v. Berger, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03321
Defendant:
Berger, Inc., DOES, Gem Healthcare LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Quishenberry
Lee et al v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia
as 2:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jung Nyeo Lee , Yi Yeon Choi , Choon Sook Yang and others
Defendant:
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2015cv01634
Plaintiff:
Shuting Huang, John Doe, John Does 1-100 and others
Illinoi:
John Doe
Michigan:
John Doe
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Lee et al v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03291
Plaintiff:
Jae Lee , Diane Lee and Sun Coleman
Defendant:
Celadon Trucking Services, Inc. , Carl L. Dixon and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jung Jae Lee v. Federal Street LA LLC et al
as 2:2014cv06264
Defendant:
Does, Federal Street Corporation, Federal Street LA LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jung Jae Lee
Jae Lee v. USA
as 14-5369
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAE LEE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dickerson v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2012cv01182
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Dickerson, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Washington, King County, Mayor of King County and Seattle, WA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONNOR et al v. KUMHO TIRE U.S.A., INC. et al
as 3:2010cv06689
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CONNOR and WILLIAM POWERS LOUTREL
Defendant:
KUMHO TIRE U.S.A., INC., KOREA EXPRESS U.S.A., INC. and HONG JAE LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
