Cases 21 - 30 of 84
Kevin Young, et al v. LG Chem LTD., et al
as 17-15857
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN YOUNG, BRADLEY SELDIN, BRUCE STERMAN and others
Objector - Appellant:
PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LG CHEM LTD., LG CHEM AMERICA, INC., SONY CORPORATION and others
Sorenson et al v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00541
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Sorenson , Randal Reep , Randal Smith and others
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Degaris et al v. Monroe County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00239
Plaintiff:
Brandy Degaris and Jane Doe Plaintiffs 1-12
Defendant:
Monroe County, Mississippi, Monroe County Sheriff's Department, Cecil Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Young, et al v. LG Chem Ltd., et al
as 16-17235
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN YOUNG, BRADLEY SELDIN, BRUCE STERMAN and others
Objector - Appellant:
PATRICK S. SWEENEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LG CHEM LTD., LG CHEM AMERICA, INC., SONY CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ahmad Khorrami v. Michael Rolince, et al
as 16-3520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AHMAD F. KHORRAMI
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL E. ROLINCE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JAMES DOYLE and others
LIEBLER v. CITY OF HOBOKEN et al
as 2:2015cv08182
Plaintiff:
DAVID LIEBLER
Defendant:
CITY OF HOBOKEN, HOBOKEN CITY COUNSEL, DAWN ZIMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOYLE v. USA
as 1:2015cv00572
Thomas E. Perez vs. James Doyle, et al
as 2:2015mc00119
Defendant:
James Doyle, Michael Garnett, Cynthia Holloway and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Stargaze Management, LLC et al v. George Smith Partners, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02755
Defendant:
Nathan Auslander, M. Spencer Beck, Blackstone Resources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Doyle, John Duran and Stargaze Management, LLC
Unknown:
Stephen McClain Cole and Alan Dabdoub
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
