Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Haas v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv13470
Plaintiff:
James Haas
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. HAAS et al
as 1:2011cv07001
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant:
JAMES HAAS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ZELLER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TRULLENDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zolnierz v. Harris et al
as 2:2011cv01182
Plaintiff:
Douglas John Zolnierz
Defendant:
Jack F Harris , Barbara Mundell , Gary Donahoe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jon Wallace v. Wesley Smith, et al
as 11-16344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON MORRIS WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
WESLEY SMITH, Dr., Individually and in his official capacity, JOHN C. COOPER, SUSAN R. BOLTON and others
Roger Waldner v. Janet Carr, et al
as 09-2246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roger Waldner
Defendant - Appellee:
Janet Wissel Carr, Dubuque Bank & Trust Company, as Trustee of the Marian Haas Kraus Trust, Marian Haas Kraus, as Trustee of the Marie C. Haas Trust, On behalf of John Chandler Kraus and others
Jones v. Rosell et al
as 2:2009cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jason Jones
Defendant:
Jason Rosell, James Haas and Office of the Public Defenders
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hennix v. Maricopa County et al
as 2:2007cv01708
Plaintiff:
Wendell Keith Hennix
Defendant:
Maricopa County, Joseph M. Arpaio, Andrew P Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haas et al v. Beyerstedt et al
as 0:2007cv02551
Plaintiff:
James Haas, James Haas, Ferrous, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ronald Beyerstedt, Nathan Beyerstedt, Nicholas Beyerstedt and others
Counter Claimant:
Nathan Beyerstedt, Nicholas Beyerstedt, Sharon Beyerstedt and others
Counter Defendant:
James Haas and Ferrous, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
