Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Campos v. Clark County et al
as 6:2019cv00547
Plaintiff:
David Campos
Defendant:
Clark County, Jeremy Mull and Jamey Noel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. NOEL et al
as 4:2019cv00164
Plaintiff:
JASON JONES
Defendant:
DAVID MILLSPAUGH, CHARLESTOWN PRIMARY CARE, LLC, TERESA K. BRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEELE et al v. CUNNINGHAM et al
as 4:2019cv00163
Defendant:
AMBER THARP, JASON VAN GILDER, KASEY CUNNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL SYNDER and JARVIS NELSON PEELE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTRIDGE v. CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIANA STATE POLICE POST 45, MATHEW ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DARREN EASTRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SWEET v. NOEL et al
as 4:2019cv00009
Defendant:
MICHAEL LOONEY, MICHAEL HAMMOND, WILLIAM HOKE and others
Plaintiff:
JANICE SWEET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COTTRELL v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2018cv00200
Defendant:
MIKE HAMMOND, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BRAD JONES and others
Plaintiff:
GREG COTTRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. NOEL et al
as 4:2018cv00014
Defendant:
C. BROCK and JAMEY NOEL
Plaintiff:
BRYAN HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMBS v. CLARK COUNTY et al
as 4:2018cv00001
Defendant:
SAM BEARD, CLARK COUNTY, CONLEN and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DANIEL COMBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUNNINGHAM v. NOEL et al
as 4:2017cv00142
Defendant:
C. BROCK, T. CAPEHART, A. CHILDRESS and others
Plaintiff:
BRUCE CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEELE v. JACOBS et al
as 4:2017cv00128
Defendant:
JACK COFFMAN, MICHAELIA SHAE GILBERT, BRADLEY JACOBS and others
Plaintiff:
JARVIS NELSON PEELE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
