Cases 21 - 30 of 277
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ELLIS v. NYIEDYE et al
as 1:2022cv02481
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
NYIEDYE, KRUL, LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marsee v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00995
Petitioner:
Jamie Marsee
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marsee v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00457
Petitioner:
Jamie Marsee
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glessner v. Baughman et al
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Alden H Glessner
Defendant:
Jamie Baughman and John Doe
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
SAWYER v. NUTTER et al
as 4:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT SAWYER
Defendant:
OFFICER NUTTER, BROWN, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSBIN v. CENTURION MEDICAL STAFF
as 2:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
JAMI MICHELLE BUSBIN
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weddle v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00931
Plaintiff:
Jamie Weddle
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Joseph Schneider and Hanely
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.L.R. et al v. Elkhart County et al
as 3:2022cv00881
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Reschly, Alisia Kay Hails, J.L.R. and others
Defendant:
Elkhart County and Peter D Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. St Joseph Superior Court et al
as 3:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
Jamie Harris and Jamie Sylvia
Defendant:
St Joseph Superior Court, Elizabeth A. Hardtke, Rita Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
