Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Raimey v. Edwards et al
as 2:2016cv00403
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. Raimey
Defendant:
Rose Edwards , Harlis J. Thompson, Jr. , Suseela Nalluri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCHUGH v. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv06765
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J MCHUGH
Defendant:
SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION , JANE DOES 6-10 and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWETT v. SOMERSET COUNTY et al
as 1:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
PAMELA SWETT
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY, BARRY DELONG, JEFFREY JACQUES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Yazoo, Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00103
Plaintiff:
Kyron La-Trell Williams
Defendant:
City of Yazoo, Mississippi, Yazoo City Police Department, Andre Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatwright v. Weldon et al
as 1:2014cv06975
Plaintiff:
Darnell Boatwright
Defendant:
Sgt. Robert Bracero, Captain CO Doe 7, Police Officers Jane Doe 6-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felix v. Lamour et al
as 1:2014cv09455
Plaintiff:
Nakami Hope Felix
Defendant:
Garry Lamour, John Doe 1, John Doe 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. John Doe1 et al
as 1:2014cv09174
Plaintiff:
Carl Roberts
Defendant:
John Doe1, John Doe, 1-5, Jane Doe 6-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Alejandro et al
as 1:2014cv09173
Plaintiff:
Arlene Washington
Defendant:
Olan Alejandro, John Doe 1, John Doe, 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DROUILLARD v. TOWNSHIP OF HANOVER et al
as 2:2014cv06650
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE E. DROUILLARD
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF HANOVER, STEPHEN W. GALLAGHER, RYAN WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
