Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Parker v. Oklahoma, State of
as 4:2010cv00757
Petitioner:
Cornell Joe Parker
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. Furr et al
as 9:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
Joe Parker
Defendant:
Corey Furr and Michael Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clyde Parker, II v. Daniel Dickerson
as 10-40837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE JOE PARKER, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL DICKERSON, Major
Clyde Parker, II v. Patrick Dickens, et al
as 10-40669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE JOE PARKER, II
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK D DICKENS, Captain, DIRETHA D. FLEMMING, Correctional Officer III and SETH M. SUAREZ, Correctional Officer III
Parker v. Dickerson
as 9:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Clyde Joe Parker, II
Defendant:
Daniel D Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shagan H. Harrison v. City of Lakeland
as 10-10791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAGAN H. HARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LAKELAND, a Municipal corporation, BRENT ADDISON, Sergeant, in his official and individual capacity and JOE PARKER, Officer, in his official and individual capacity
Clyde Parker v. Kelli Ward, et al
as 09-40979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE JOE PARKER, II
Defendant - Appellee:
N JACKSON, Assistant Warden, WILLIAM R. OGDEN, Correctional Officer, RUDOLFO DIAZ, JR. and others
PARKER et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv81054
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE COMPANY, GILBRALTAR INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALICE J. PARKER and BILLY JOE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Parker et al
as 1:2009cv04875
Plaintiff:
Abraham Martinez
Defendant:
Joe Parker and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Parker v. Dickens et al
as 9:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Clyde Joe Parker, II
Defendant:
Patrick D. Dickens, Diretha D, Flemming and Seth M Suarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
