Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv24942
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
US v. Jorge Rivera
as 19-4771
Defendant / Appellant:
JORGE HERNANDEZ RIVERA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Morales et al v. Tecton Cafe Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03303
Plaintiff:
Esteban Morales and Jorge Raymundo Rivera
Defendant:
Stacey Sosa, Elias Sosa and Tecton Cafe Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clemente et al v. Midtown East NY LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02647
Plaintiff:
Isaul Villa Medel, Osvaldo Villa Clemente, Rogelio Villa Clemente and others
Defendant:
Michael Pitsinos, George Hadjipanayi and Midtown East NY LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jorge Alvarenga-Rivera v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71895
Petitioner:
JORGE ALVARENGA-RIVERA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Rivera v. Autozone Stores, LLC
as 0:2017cv62066
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Rivera
Defendant:
Autozoners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
USA v. Jorge Rivera, Jr.
as 17-40286
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE ALBERTO RIVERA, JR.
Morales et al v. Wichcraft Management LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03023
Plaintiff:
Esteban Morales , Alejandro Molina , Andres Rosario and others
Defendant:
Wichcraft Management LLC , Wichcraft Operating LLC , Wichcraft Chelsea Piers LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jorge Mendoza-Rivera v. Loretta E. Lynch
as 16-1843
Petitioner:
Jorge Mendoza-Rivera
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States
Rivera-Quinones et al v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2015cv02382
Plaintiff:
Cruz Alberto Rivera-Quinones , Luis F. Cruz-Figueroa , Carmen Quinones-Figueroa and others
Defendant:
Luis Caldero, Guillermo Somoza-Colombani, Hector Pesquera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
