Cases 21 - 30 of 152
Joseph Felton v. Edwin Njenga, et al
as 22-10641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANDREW FELTON
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWIN NJENGA, SMITH, CLOPTON and others
USA v. Joseph Malotte
as 21-5938
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANDREW MALOTTE
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, MI v. Offenburger
as 4:2021cv00286
Plaintiff:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, MI as Subrogee of Danielle Vance and Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, MI
Defendant:
Joseph Andrew Offenburger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Demond White v. George Schaefer, Jr.
as 21-7248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMOND ANTOINE WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE SCHAEFER, JR., III, NICOLE E. JANICKI, Detective, NPD (31043), CHRISTOPHER W. ROCCIO, Detective, NPD (29301) and others
Stanford v. Microsoft Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
IBM, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Stanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROMERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14087
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANDREW ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09785
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANDREW ROTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beach v. Lumpkin
as 2:2021cv00014
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Joseph Andrew Beach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beach v. Lumpkin
as 2:2021cv00013
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Joseph Andrew Beach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Demond White v. Thurman Livingston
as 21-6072
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY JANE HALL, Norfolk Circuit Court Judge, THERESE C. MOYNIHAM, Forensic Scientist, PHILIP G. EVANS, II, Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMOND ANTOINE WHITE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
