Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Joyce Lee-Hickman v. Joseph Keffer
as 11-10804
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOYCE LEE HICKMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH KEFFER, Warden
Lee-Hickman v. Keffer
as 4:2011cv00439
Petitioner:
Joyce Lee-Hickman
Respondent:
Joseph Keffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEE et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61751
Plaintiff:
JOYCE LEE and JOHN W. LEE
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE et al v. NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61586
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. LEE, JR. and JOYCE LEE
Defendant:
NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hickman v. Keffer
as 4:2010cv00527
Petitioner:
Joyce Lee-Hickman
Respondent:
Joe Keffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joyce Lee, et al. v. Anaconda Aluminum, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-91483
Plaintiff:
Joyce Lee
Defendant:
Anaconda Aluminum
Shine v. Leasa Industries Co Inc et al
as 1:2009cv20429
Plaintiff:
Willie Shine
Defendant:
Leasa Industries Co Inc, Joyce Lee, Joe R Munar and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lacey v. Doyle et al
as 2:2008cv00777
Plaintiff:
Linda Lacey
Defendant:
J Doyle, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Lieutenant Governor and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Estate of Bobbie G. Overton, Sr. et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01017
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Bobbie G. Overton, Sr., Estate of James Ellis, Carolyn Evans and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Monsanto Company, G.D. Searle LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
CRAIN et al v. AQUA CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv69147
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOYD CRAIN and JOYC LEE CRAIN
Defendant:
AQUA CHEM, INC., BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
