Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Clark v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 3:2019cv00036
Defendant:
John Doe #4, Jane Doe #1, Darrel Vannoy and others
Plaintiff:
Georgia Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Cazes et al
as 3:2017cv01752
Defendant:
Acadian Ambulance Services, Inc., Esdron Brown, Mike Cazes and others
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wetzel v. Tanner et al
as 2:2016cv05765
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wetzel
Defendant:
Robert Tanner, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Ackal et al
as 6:2015cv02288
Plaintiff:
Yulanda Thompson
Defendant:
Louis Ackal, Richard Hazlewood, Paul Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitre v. City of Eunice, et al
as 6:2014cv02843
Plaintiff:
Jana K Pitre
Defendant:
City of Eunice, Rusty Moody, Police Dept City of Eunice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sellers v. Ackal et al
as 6:2014cv02486
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sellers
Defendant:
Louis Ackal , Wesley Hayes, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harter v. BP PLC et al
as 3:2013cv00337
Defendant:
BP P.L.C., John Doe 12, John Doe 13 and others
Plaintiff:
David Harter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Southern United States Trade Association v. John Doe 1 et al
as 2:2010cv01669
Plaintiff:
Southern United States Trade Association
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Distefano v. Tunica Biloxi Indian Tribe of Louisiana
as 1:2009cv00693
Plaintiff:
Joseph Distefano, Jr, Joseph Distefano, Jr, Joseph Distefano, Jr and others
Defendant:
Earl J Barbry, Sr, Harold Pierite, Sr, Donald Ray Johnson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
