Cases 21 - 30 of 126
GARRETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84995
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Lewis
as 2:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
John Garrett Smith
Defendant:
Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv48086
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Coleman
as 3:2020cv05319
Plaintiff:
John Garrett Smith
Defendant:
J Coleman
Respondent:
G Jones and R Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GARRETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26187
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Jones et al
as 3:2020cv05059
Defendant:
E Jungbauer, G Jones and E Smith
Plaintiff:
John Garrett Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Nealy
as 2:2020cv00004
Plaintiff:
John Garrett Smith
Defendant:
Terry Nealy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gallagher et al v. Torres et al
as 3:2019cv02296
Defendant:
C/O Seth Mansfield, Craig Eiden, Commander Bloom and others
Plaintiff:
Holden Gallagher, John Garrett, Thomas Van Tuinen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Smith v. Ronald Hayes
as 19-35833
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN GARRETT SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD HAYES
Ortagus Bennett v. Randy Smith
as 19-2055
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GARRETT, in his individual and representative capacity as a agent for the US Drug Enforcement Agency, JAMES & JOAN DOE 1-10, in their individual and representative capacities Agents of the State of South Carolina Law Enforcement Agencies, JOHN & JANE DOES 1 - 10, DEA agents in their individual and representative capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORTAGUS DEMETRICE BENNETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
