Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wiscovitch-Rentas v. Ortiz-Colon
as 20-1207
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NOREEN WISCOVITCH RENTAS, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Debtor, Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez, P.S.C.
Defendant:
JANET NAVARRETE, EMILY AREAN, JOSE ALBERTO SOSA-LLORENS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
RICARDO L. ORTIZ-COLON
Not Yet Classified:
FIDDLER GONZALEZ & RODRIGUEZ, P.S.C.
Jose Acosta-Flores v. William Barr
as 20-70724
Petitioner:
JOSE ALIRIO ACOSTA-FLORES
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Wiscovitch-Rentas v. Alvarez, et al
as 19-2283
Defendant:
JANET NAVARRETE, EMILY AREAN, JOSE ALBERTO SOSA-LLORENS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NOREEN WISCOVITCH RENTAS
Debtor:
FIDDLER GONZALEZ & RODRIGUEZ, P.S.C.
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE JULIAN ALVEREZ, CHARLES BIMBELA, MARY DEAL and others
Mallick v. Acosta et al
as 1:2019cv04225
Defendant:
Jose Alvarez Acosta and Misleshevo LLC
Plaintiff:
Poran Kumer Mallick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Acosta v. O'Connor et al
as 2:2019cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joe Angel Acosta, III and Jose Angel Acosta
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, NFN Wallace, Paul Burch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Acosta, III v. Lorie Davis, Director, et al
as 18-10497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE ANGEL ACOSTA, III, also known as Jose Angel Acosta
Defendant - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, DIRECTOR OF TDCJ/STGMO, RESPONSIBLE CRO (CLASSIFICATION RECORDS OFFICE) OFFICIAL/S and others
Acosta v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al
as 1:2018cv02230
Plaintiff:
Jose Armando Acosta
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Astrazeneca LP and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
