Cases 21 - 30 of 152
KAETZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUDGE KEVIN MCNULTY, JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medcalf v. Brewer
as 3:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen Medcalf
Defendant:
R Brewer
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. 1st Franklin Financial Corporation
as 2:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen
Defendant:
1st Franklin Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Moreland v. 1st Franklin Financial Corporation
as 2:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
William Moreland, Mark Dunn, Joshua Allen and others
Defendant:
1st Franklin Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
COTTRELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01860
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ALLEN COTTRELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MALFER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24126
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ALLEN MALFER and JOSHUA MALFER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ENGSTROM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19449
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ALLEN ENGSTROM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00312
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MOONEYHAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16385
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ALLEN MOONEYHAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16439
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ALLEN BAILEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
