Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Evans v. Barnhart et al
as 1:2020cv02513
Defendant:
J. A. Barnhart, G. Romain, S. Eacker and others
Plaintiff:
Verdell Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mikeal Stine v. B. Von Blankensee, et al
as 20-16393
Defendant / Appellee:
ASH, Medical Doctor, USP/Tucson, Arizona, BASS, Health Services Administrator, USP/Tucson, Arizona, SEGAL, Unknown; Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Stine v. Blankensee et al
as 4:2020cv00187
Defendant:
Unknown Waite, Jean Louis, Haigh Biehler and others
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02003
Plaintiff:
Debra K. Garcia
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
United States of America v. Garcia
as 5:2019mc00369
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Ronald K. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
HELM et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01192
Plaintiff:
Tonee Kinnamon, Bernie March, Marly Laborde and others
Defendant:
National Foam Inc., Chemguard, The 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Daniel Garcia v. USA
as 17-11952
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL K. GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Daniel Garcia
as 16-12070
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL K. GARCIA
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garcia et al v. DESARROLLADORA DE ILUSIONES, S.A. DE C.V. et al
as 5:2015cv01116
Defendant:
Ronald Scott Brown, Clarion Partners, LLC, James Christian Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
COMERCIALIZADORA Y CONSTRUCTORA MIGSAL, S.A. DE C.V.,, DESARROLLADORA DE ILUSIONES, S.A. DE C.V., ECON DESARROLLADOR INMOBILIARIO, S.A. DE C.V., and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
